BRC Academy · Contracts

CCDC 2-2020 walkthrough: what changed from 2008

CCDC 2 is the stipulated price contract most Canadian owners sign, and the 2020 edition replaced a document that had been in use for twelve years. Many owners still carry Supplementary Conditions written for 2008. This lesson walks through what actually changed, part by part, so you can see which of your old amendments now fight the form instead of improving it.

Learning outcomes

  • Explain why Ready-for-Takeover, not Substantial Performance, is now the milestone that ends Contract Time and starts most post-completion clocks.
  • Describe the main changes in each part of the General Conditions, from document review to waivers.
  • Explain how the 2020 payment provisions work with Ontario's prompt payment rules and where the statute overrides the form.
  • Review a set of 2008-era Supplementary Conditions and decide which to delete, rewrite or keep, using the Northgate case.

The lesson

Why a new edition was needed

CCDC released the new CCDC 2 in December 2020 and kept publishing the 2008 version for one more year so projects already in tender could finish on it. Two pressures drove the rewrite: provincial prompt payment and adjudication laws (Ontario's arrived in October 2019) that the 2008 payment clauses did not reflect, and a decade of owners complaining that a building can be "substantially performed" under lien law yet not usable.

The 2020 edition adds new defined terms (Ready-for-Takeover, Payment Legislation and Submittals), rewrites Part 5 for prompt payment, adds adjudication, and moves a number of procedural clauses out of the General Conditions and into the Division 00 and 01 specifications. As lesson 5 explained, the Agreement, Definitions and General Conditions travel as a package with the owner's Supplementary Conditions. When the package changes, the amendments have to change with it.

The biggest change: the clocks moved to Ready-for-Takeover

Under CCDC 2-2008, Substantial Performance of the Work did almost everything. It was the date the contractor had to reach on time, the date the warranty started, the end of the contractor's insurance period and the trigger for the waiver of claims. It was also, separately, the statutory event that starts lien periods and holdback release.

CCDC 2-2020 splits those jobs. Substantial Performance now simply defers to the definition in the applicable lien legislation, and it still drives the statutory holdback and lien process. A new, later milestone, Ready-for-Takeover in GC 12.1, takes over the contractual jobs. The contractor must now achieve Ready-for-Takeover within the Contract Time; the one-year warranty in GC 12.3 starts there; insurance in GC 11.1 runs to it; and the indemnity and waiver periods in GC 13.1 and 13.2 are measured from it. Figure 1 shows the shift. Lesson 7 covers how the two milestones are tested and certified.

Which milestone starts which clock, 2008 versus 2020 In CCDC 2-2008 a single milestone, Substantial Performance, ends Contract Time, starts the holdback and lien clock, starts the warranty, ends the insurance period and starts claim waivers. In CCDC 2-2020 Substantial Performance keeps only the statutory holdback and lien clock; Ready-for-Takeover under GC 12.1 ends Contract Time and drives the warranty, insurance and waiver periods. CCDC 2-2008 Substantial Performance Contract Time ends Holdback and lien clock (Act) Warranty starts Insurance period ends Claim waivers start CCDC 2-2020 Substantial Performance Ready-for- Takeover (GC 12.1) Holdback and lien clock (Act) Contract Time ends Warranty starts (GC 12.3) Insurance ends (GC 11.1) Claim waivers (GC 13.2)
Figure 1. Which milestone starts which clock, 2008 versus 2020. Substantial Performance keeps the statutory job; Ready-for-Takeover takes the contractual ones. Source: BRC, based on CCDC 2-2020 as summarized by the OAA, Gowling WLG and Torkin Manes.

For owners this is mostly good news: in 2008 the warranty and insurance clocks could start on a building with no occupancy permit or manuals. Now the contractor is not on time until the building can be taken over. The catch is that owners who still write liquidated damages or bonus clauses against "Substantial Performance" are now measuring the wrong date.

Part by part: what else changed

Figure 2 maps the changes across all thirteen parts of the General Conditions, rated by how much they affect an owner's Supplementary Conditions. The ratings are BRC's judgement. The notes below cover the ones that matter most.

CCDC 2-2020 change map by General Conditions part Thirteen rows, one for each part of the General Conditions, with a short description of the change and an impact rating from one to three dots. Payment (GC 5) and Ready-for-Takeover, early occupancy and warranty (GC 12) are rated three. Documents, execution, changes and delays, disputes, insurance and indemnity are rated two. The rest are rated one. Part What changed in 2020 Impact GC 1Contractor's document review narrowed GC 2Consultant findings in writing; RFT review GC 3Constructor role dropped; submittal schedule GC 4Cash allowances can be reallocated GC 5Payment rewritten for prompt payment GC 6Change Directive costs; delay relief tied to RFT GC 7Owner, not Consultant, decides default GC 8Adjudication added (GC 8.2) GC 9Safety compliance shared (GC 9.4) GC 10WSIB proof moved to each payment GC 11Insurance runs to RFT; contract security gone GC 12New: RFT, early occupancy, warranty GC 13Indemnity and waivers keyed to RFT Dots: impact on an owner's Supplementary Conditions (BRC judgement).
Figure 2. CCDC 2-2020 change map by part of the General Conditions. Orange marks the two parts with the most impact on owners. Source: BRC, based on the OAA Practice Tip on CCDC 2 changes and law firm summaries listed in the references.
View the data
PartMain changeImpact (1–3)
GC 1Contractor review limited to coordination and execution; former GC 3.4 deleted2
GC 2Consultant findings in writing within a reasonable time; Consultant reviews for Substantial Performance and Ready-for-Takeover1
GC 3Owner's constructor role removed from the form; shop drawing and submittal review schedule2
GC 4Unspent cash allowances can cover shortfalls in others1
GC 5Applications to Owner and Consultant together; Payment Legislation; Owner's notice of non-payment; 28-day payment3
GC 6Change Directive cost categories (GC 6.3.7); stop-order relief limited (GC 6.5.2); contractor-caused delay costs (GC 6.5.6)2
GC 7Owner decides whether to declare default (GC 7.1.2)1
GC 8Adjudication added (GC 8.2)2
GC 9Health and safety responsibilities of both parties (GC 9.4)1
GC 10Workers' compensation proof moved to GC 5.2.71
GC 11Insurance period to Ready-for-Takeover; limits per CCDC 41; contract security clause deleted2
GC 12Ready-for-Takeover (12.1), early occupancy (12.2), warranty from Ready-for-Takeover (12.3)3
GC 13Indirect and consequential losses excluded; waivers rewritten around Ready-for-Takeover2

Ratings are BRC's judgement of the effect on a typical owner's Supplementary Conditions.

Document review (GC 1.1). The 2008 edition's GC 3.4 was deleted. The contractor now reviews the Contract Documents to coordinate and carry out its work, rather than carrying a broad positive duty to find and report design errors. Summaries differ on how much reporting obligation survives, which is itself a reason to be explicit: many owners restore a review-and-report duty in their Supplementary Conditions.

Consultant and safety (GC 2, GC 3, GC 9). Consultant findings must be in writing within a reasonable time, and the Consultant reviews for both milestones. The 2008 clause dealing with the owner's role as constructor under occupational health and safety law is gone; GC 9.4 instead sets out what each party must comply with. The form no longer allocates the constructor role, so the Supplementary Conditions should.

Payment (GC 5). This part was rebuilt. Applications go to the Owner and the Consultant at the same time and must meet the applicable Payment Legislation, which in Ontario means a proper invoice. Each application now needs workers' compensation proof and, after the first payment, a CCDC 9A statutory declaration. The Owner, not the Consultant, gives written notice of any amount it will not pay. Progress payment is due on the 28th day after receipt, subject to the statute. Figure 3 overlays the form on Ontario's timeline.

The payment clock under CCDC 2-2020 in Ontario A vertical timeline in calendar days from receipt of a proper invoice. Day 0: application goes to Owner and Consultant together. Day 10: Consultant certifies. Day 14: last day for the Owner's notice of non-payment under the Construction Act. Day 28: Owner pays the undisputed amount. Day 35: contractor pays its subcontractors, seven days after receiving payment. Calendar days after a proper invoice is received Day 0 Application to Owner and ConsultantProper invoice, WSIB proof, CCDC 9A (GC 5.2) Day 10 Consultant certifies the amountGC 5.3 Day 14 Owner's last day for notice of non-paymentConstruction Act, prescribed form Day 28 Owner pays the undisputed amountConstruction Act; GC 5.3.1.2 Day 35 Contractor pays its subcontractors7 days after it is paid (Act)
Figure 3. The progress payment clock for a CCDC 2-2020 contract in Ontario, assuming the owner pays on day 28. Where the form and the statute differ, the statute governs. Source: BRC, based on Gowling WLG and Torkin Manes summaries of CCDC 2-2020 and Bennett Jones on Ontario prompt payment.
View the data
DayEventSource of the rule
0Contractor's application (proper invoice) received by Owner and ConsultantGC 5.2.1; Construction Act
10Consultant certifies the amount dueGC 5.3
14Last day for the Owner's notice of non-paymentConstruction Act
28Owner pays the undisputed amountConstruction Act; GC 5.3.1.2
35Contractor pays subcontractors (7 days after being paid on day 28)Construction Act

Two holdback points catch owners. First, the form says statutory holdback is due within 10 working days after the lien period expires (GC 5.4.3), but Ontario requires payment as soon as it expires, so the statute wins. Second, the form dropped any non-statutory holdback; an owner who wants extra retention must write it into the Agreement. And since January 1, 2026, Ontario requires annual release of accrued holdback, which the 2020 form never anticipated.

Changes and delays (GC 6). GC 6.3.7 now lists the cost categories a contractor can charge for a Change Directive, limited to costs that contribute directly to it. The owner does not pay consequential or indirect damages for delays it causes (GC 6.5.1). A stop-work order by a court or public authority only earns time if it stops the contractor from reaching Ready-for-Takeover by the contract date (GC 6.5.2). And where the contractor causes delay, it reimburses the owner's reasonable costs, including the Consultant's extra fees (GC 6.5.6).

Default and disputes (GC 7, GC 8). In GC 7.1.2 the Consultant describes the contractor's neglect but the owner decides whether to declare default. GC 8.2 confirms that the contract does not limit either party's right to statutory adjudication, alongside negotiation, mediation and arbitration.

Insurance and security (GC 11). The insurance period runs to Ready-for-Takeover, and the requirements follow CCDC 41, which raised several limits (general liability from $5 million to $10 million) and added contractor's pollution liability. The 2008 contract security clause was removed from the General Conditions; bonds now live in the Division 00 documents.

Indemnity and waiver (GC 13). Indemnities between the parties exclude indirect, consequential, punitive and exemplary damages, while third-party claims are not capped. The waiver of claims in GC 13.2 was rewritten around Ready-for-Takeover and separates contract claims from lien claims.

Housekeeping. Fax is no longer valid notice under Article A-6, and cleanup, site documents and some procedures moved to the Division 01 specifications.

Northgate worked example

Northgate Distribution Centre (fictional) is a 12,000 m² tilt-up warehouse in Vaughan, Ontario. Northgate Logistics Inc. (fictional) signed CCDC 2-2020 with Halvorsen Builders Ltd. (fictional) on January 11, 2027, for $34,950,000 excluding HST, with owner Supplementary Conditions. Ridgeline Architects Inc. (fictional) is the Consultant. Facts are from the Northgate fact sheet.

The owner's lawyer started from a set of Supplementary Conditions the owner had used on a 2008-form warehouse. The owner's representative's job was to test each old amendment against the 2020 form. Here is how the main ones came out.

2008-era amendmentProblem under 2020Northgate decision
Completion date and liquidated damages keyed to Substantial PerformanceContract Time now ends at Ready-for-TakeoverRewritten: Ready-for-Takeover by Fri Jan 14, 2028 (M9)
Holdback released 10 working days after lien expiryConflicts with Ontario timing and the 2026 annual release rulesDeleted; SCs defer to the Construction Act
Extra 5% non-statutory holdbackThe 2020 form has no such mechanism to amendDropped; deficiencies covered by GC 5.6 deferred work
Contractor to review documents and report errorsFormer GC 3.4 deletedKept, rewritten as a new SC duty before each work package
Owner not to be constructorForm is now silentKept: Halvorsen is named constructor in the SCs
Warranty starts at Substantial PerformanceGC 12.3 starts it at Ready-for-TakeoverDeleted; form already better for the owner
Schedule submission clauseStill needed; form remains light on schedulesKept: baseline due Wed Feb 10, 2027
Insurance scheduleLimits now come from CCDC 41Replaced by a reference to CCDC 41
Added Ready-for-Takeover itemsGC 12.1 prerequisites can only change by SCAdded: ESFR sprinkler acceptance and dock equipment training

The result was shorter Supplementary Conditions. Several 2008 amendments only fixed problems the 2020 form had already fixed, and keeping them would have created conflicts. The trade contracts follow the same edition logic: Halvorsen's trades are on CCA 1-2021, which carries Ready-for-Takeover down the chain.

Owner's move

  • Retire your 2008 Supplementary Conditions. Do not "update the references". Start from the 2020 form and add only what your project needs.
  • Search every SC for "Substantial Performance". Decide in each case whether you mean the statutory milestone or Ready-for-Takeover. Liquidated damages almost always belong on Ready-for-Takeover.
  • Let the statute run payment. Where Ontario's Construction Act sets a deadline, defer to it rather than restating it.
  • Write the constructor role down. The form no longer does it for you.

Common mistakes

  1. Tendering on the 2020 form with 2008 SCs. Clause numbers no longer line up, and old amendments can override better new wording.
  2. Measuring delay against the wrong milestone. A schedule that shows "Substantial Completion" as the contract finish date misreads the 2020 contract.
  3. Relying on the form's holdback dates. In Ontario the statutory timing, including the 2026 annual release rules, controls.
  4. Assuming the contractor still checks the design. Without an SC, its review is for coordination only.
  5. Forgetting the bonds. With contract security out of the General Conditions, bonding has to be required in the tender and Division 00 documents.

Quick quiz

  1. Under CCDC 2-2020, which milestone must the contractor reach within the Contract Time?

    1. Substantial Performance
    2. Ready-for-Takeover
    3. Total Performance
    4. Final completion
  2. Which milestone still starts the statutory holdback and lien process in Ontario?

    1. Ready-for-Takeover
    2. Early occupancy
    3. Substantial Performance, as defined in the lien legislation
    4. The end of the warranty period
  3. Under CCDC 2-2020, who gives the contractor written notice of an amount that will not be paid?

    1. The Consultant
    2. The Owner
    3. The adjudicator
    4. The surety
  4. A court stop-work order delays Northgate by two weeks but Halvorsen can still reach Ready-for-Takeover by the contract date. Under GC 6.5.2, what does Halvorsen get?

    1. Time and cost
    2. Time only
    3. No extension
    4. Liquidated damages from the owner
  5. When does the one-year warranty in GC 12.3 start for parts of the Work the owner has not occupied early?

    1. At contract execution
    2. At Substantial Performance
    3. At Ready-for-Takeover
    4. At final payment
Show answers and explanations
  1. B. The 2020 edition ties Contract Time to Ready-for-Takeover, which requires Substantial Performance plus further conditions.
  2. C. Substantial Performance now follows the lien legislation's definition and keeps driving holdback and liens.
  3. B. GC 5.3.1.1 moved the notice of non-payment to the Owner, matching Ontario's prompt payment rules.
  4. C. Stop-order relief is only available if the delay prevents Ready-for-Takeover by the date in the contract.
  5. C. The warranty now starts at Ready-for-Takeover; for parts occupied early under GC 12.2, it starts at occupancy.

Key terms

Ready-for-Takeover
The CCDC 2-2020 milestone in GC 12.1 when the Work can be handed over, which ends Contract Time.
Substantial Performance of the Work
The statutory milestone defined by the applicable lien legislation; in Ontario, section 2 of the Construction Act.
Payment Legislation
A 2020 defined term for the prompt payment law that applies where the project is located.
Proper invoice
Under Ontario's Construction Act, an invoice that meets the statutory content rules and starts the 28-day payment clock.
Change Directive
A written instruction to proceed with a change before price or time is agreed; GC 6.3.7 lists the claimable costs.
Adjudication
A fast statutory process for interim decisions on payment and related disputes, preserved by GC 8.2.
Early occupancy
Owner use of all or part of the Work before Ready-for-Takeover under GC 12.2, with the contractor's agreement and authority approval.

References

  1. Ontario Association of Architects, Practice Tip PT.23.11: CCDC 2-2020 overview of changes (2021).
  2. Gowling WLG, What the new CCDC 2 stipulated price contract means for you (December 2020).
  3. Torkin Manes LLP, Canadian construction contracts: welcome to the new CCDC 2 (2020) (February 2021).
  4. Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, CCDC 2: updates to the stipulated price contract (December 2020).
  5. Thompson Dorfman Sweatman LLP,10 key changes in the CCDC 2 (2020) (insurance limits).
  6. Bennett Jones LLP, Prompt payment for construction in Ontario (October 2019).
  7. DLA Piper, Critical amendments to Ontario Construction Act have arrived (January 2026).
  8. Government of Ontario, Construction Act, R.S.O. 1990, c. C.30 (e-Laws).

Verified on November 4, 2026.

Next lesson in this trackReady-for-Takeover vs Substantial Performance

This lesson is general education, not legal advice. Get advice from a construction lawyer on your contract.

PMI, PMP and PMBOK are registered marks of the Project Management Institute, Inc. Oracle and Primavera are trademarks of Oracle. Microsoft Project is a trademark of Microsoft. BRC Academy is not affiliated with or endorsed by these organizations.

← All BRC Academy lessons

Have a program that's slipping, or about to start?

Book a 30-minute call. We'll tell you where your schedule and budget are exposed, and what an owner's rep would change, before you commit to anything.