Negotiation and settlement

Most construction claims settle. The question is when, for how much, and at what cost in fees and relationships. Good settlements come from preparation: knowing your numbers, the other side's numbers and the cost of not agreeing. This lesson covers how to prepare, how to negotiate, and what a settlement agreement has to say so the claim stays closed.

Learning outcomes

  • Prepare a negotiation position from an assessed claim.
  • Explain without-prejudice discussions and their limits.
  • Structure offers around heads of claim rather than totals.
  • List the essential terms of a construction claim settlement.

The lesson

Prepare

Know three numbers before you meet: your assessed value, your best realistic outcome, and the cost of not agreeing: fees, management time, interest and the risk of an adjudication or arbitration going against you. Know the same for the other side. If the gap between the parties' realistic outcomes is smaller than the cost of fighting, settlement is rational for both.

From claim to settlementStep 1: assess the claim head by head. Step 2: estimate the cost of not agreeing. Step 3: negotiate without prejudice, head by head. Step 4: agree amount, time and set-off. Step 5: sign a settlement with a limited release.1Assess head by headYour evidence-based value2Cost of not agreeingFees, time, interest, risk3Negotiate without prejudiceFindings as the agenda4Agree money, time, set-offOne net figure5Sign with a limited releaseCovered claims only
Figure 1. The path from an assessed claim to a signed settlement. Source: BRC.

Negotiate

Settlement discussions are usually held "without prejudice", so offers cannot generally be used later as admissions; confirm the basis in writing and take legal advice on its limits. Negotiate head by head, using the findings as the agenda, rather than trading totals. Concede where the evidence is against you; it buys credibility where it is with you. CCDC 2-2020 Part 8 contemplates negotiation and mediation before arbitration [1].

Settle

A settlement agreement should state: the claims and events covered; the amount, payment date and any set-off; the time extension, recorded by Change Order; the revised contract dates; a release limited to the covered claims; what is excluded, such as latent defects and warranty; and who bears costs. Have counsel draft or review it.

Northgate worked example

Northgate Distribution Centre (fictional) is a 12,000 m² tilt-up warehouse in Vaughan, Ontario, built by Halvorsen Builders Ltd. (fictional) under CCDC 2-2020, with Ridgeline Architects Inc. (fictional) as Consultant. See the Northgate fact sheet. This course follows one delay claim from first notice to settlement. Ready-for-Takeover (M9) was due Friday, January 14, 2028 and was reached on Tuesday, March 14, 2028: 60 calendar days late. All events, dates and amounts are illustrative.

The parties met three times in June 2028, without prejudice, using Ridgeline's findings as the agenda. The schedulers had already agreed the windows (lesson 10), so time was settled quickly at 42 days. Money moved head by head (Figure 2).

Claim C-01: from claim to net paymentClaimed $1,140,000. Assessed $265,060. Settled $265,000. Less liquidated damages $81,000. Net payment $184,000.Claimed$1,140,000Assessed (May 19, 2028)$265,060Settled (June 23, 2028)$265,000Less liquidated damages$81,000Net payment to Halvorsen$184,000
Figure 2. How Claim C-01 closed: settlement at the assessed value, with LDs set off. Illustrative. Source: BRC, Northgate case study.
View the data
ItemValue
Claimed$1,140,000
Assessed (May 19, 2028)$265,060
Settled (June 23, 2028)$265,000
Less liquidated damages$81,000
Net payment to Halvorsen$184,000

Halvorsen's offers went from $1,140,000 to $640,000 to $390,000. The owner opened at $210,000, moved to $250,000, and the parties agreed $265,000 on June 23, 2028: essentially the assessed value. The settlement recorded a 42-day extension by Change Order, a revised Ready-for-Takeover date of February 25, 2028, payment of $265,000 less $81,000 of liquidated damages, a net payment of $184,000 within 15 days, a release of Claim C-01 and events E-01 to E-06 only, and each party bearing its own costs. Warranty and latent defects were expressly excluded from the release.

Your move

If you are the owner

  • Settle near your assessed value. If the evidence supports it, pay it.
  • Set off LDs in the same agreement. One net number closes both sides.
  • Limit the release. Covered claims only; keep warranty and latent defects.
  • Record time by Change Order. It keeps the contract record clean.

If you are the contractor

  • Know your realistic number. Not your claimed number.
  • Concede weak heads early. It strengthens the strong ones.
  • Count the cost of fighting. Fees and time often exceed the gap.
  • Get payment terms in writing. Amount, date and set-off.

Common mistakes

  1. Splitting the difference on totals.
  2. Open-ended releases.
  3. Forgetting the time extension.
  4. No payment date.
  5. Negotiating without the analysis done.

Quick quiz

  1. What three numbers should you know before negotiating?

    1. Bid, budget, actual
    2. Assessed value, best realistic outcome, cost of not agreeing
    3. LDs, holdback, retention
    4. Days, weeks, months
  2. What does "without prejudice" generally do?

    1. Makes offers binding
    2. Generally prevents offers being used later as admissions
    3. Ends the contract
    4. Waives notice
  3. What should a release cover?

    1. Everything forever
    2. Only the claims and events listed
    3. Nothing
    4. Warranty too
  4. What was Halvorsen's net payment?

    1. $265,000
    2. $184,000
    3. $81,000
    4. $1,140,000
  5. Why was time settled quickly at Northgate?

    1. The owner gave in
    2. The schedulers had already agreed the windows
    3. Time was not claimed
    4. The contract was silent
Show answers and explanations
  1. B. Those three frame a rational settlement.
  2. B. Take advice on its limits.
  3. B. A limited release keeps other rights intact.
  4. B. $265,000 − $81,000.
  5. B. Agreeing the analysis first narrowed the dispute.

Key terms

Without prejudice
A basis for settlement talks that generally keeps offers out of later proceedings.
Release
A party's agreement to give up specified claims.
Set-off
Deducting one party's claim from the other's to reach a net payment.
Settlement agreement
The written contract that resolves a claim.
Cost of not agreeing
Fees, time, interest and risk of continuing a dispute.

References

  1. Canadian Construction Documents Committee, CCDC 2-2020 Stipulated Price Contract, GC 6.4 to 6.6 and Part 8. Clause content checked against a publicly posted tender copy; buy the form from CCDC.
  2. Fenwick Elliott, The SCL Delay and Disruption Protocol: a second edition (November 2017), summarizing the Society of Construction Law Protocol, 2nd edition (February 2017).
  3. BRC, Northgate fact sheet (fictional case study, v1, November 4, 2026).

Verified on November 9, 2026.

Next lesson in this trackAdjudication, arbitration and litigation in Ontario

This lesson is general education, not legal advice. Get advice from a construction lawyer on your contract.

Northgate Distribution Centre, Northgate Logistics Inc., Halvorsen Builders Ltd. and Ridgeline Architects Inc. are fictional and are used for teaching only. AACE is a registered mark of AACE International. BRC Academy is not affiliated with or endorsed by these organizations.

← All Claims lessons

Facing a delay claim right now?

Book a 30-minute call. Ben prepares and reviews delay claims for owners and contractors: entitlement, schedule analysis and quantum.